Attorney Michael de Broglio on: South Africa, Law, Politics, Attorneys, Sport, Photography, Technology, Gadgets, Media, Crime, Road Accidents Fund,
Divorce, Maintenance, Personal Injury, Medical Negligence
Very few people are aware, and once they become aware, they get quite upset that money paid for medical expenses in RAF claims are invariably refunded to the medical aid. Most clients feel that they pay the medical aid a monthly amount, and when the case is finalised, they should then get all the past medical expenses themselves. What very few people realise is that, if they read the policy they actually have quite carefully, they actually only have a sickness benefit in terms of their medical aid and not an accident benefit. In other words, medical aids do not actually have to pay out if you are injured in an accident, and the only reason they do this, is that they know in most cases that money will be refunded from your Road Accident Fund claim.
The one benefit that people have is that there is no doubt as a result of the moneys recovered by the medical aids in this regard, that they are able to keep medical aid contributions lower than they would be – in other words, if none of that money went back to them, every group will then be responsible for the payment of all of the accident expenses, and as a result monthly premiums would certainly have to go up, over and above whatever the usual increases are – and may then make medical aids even more unaffordable. There is only one medical aid in the country which allows its members to keep the money, if the accident was after 30 June 2009 and you may think about it when you hear who that medical aid is, especially when you think about who actually pays the costs in an event of a shortfall. It is GEMS, or the Government Employees Medical Scheme, and they not only cover the expenses, but allow the employees to keep whatever is recovered from the Road Accident Fund. That is obviously one of the benefits of working for the government, and having your salary and benefits paid for by – wait for it – us!
Posted by Michael de Broglio on Wednesday 17-Jul-13
Post a Comment
Comments
Jane Mane said:
on Wednesday 05-Sep-18 09:39 AM
Good morning
Does the same principle apply in a claim for future medical expenses where the RAF has issued an undertaking certificate? Should the RAF reimburse the injured where the medical aid has already paid?
Thanks and kind regards
Thabitha said:
on Monday 30-May-16 04:16 PM
I think they inform you of this before you can take the medical aid
Suzanne said:
on Friday 27-May-16 01:44 PM
I do think that it is fair that the money recovered from the RAF be paid to the medical aid. If this was not the case, many medical schemes would already be shut down due to finances. Or we would be paying much more for medical aid than we already are!
Cecilia said:
on Tuesday 01-Apr-14 07:32 PM
Hi there, am actually faced with the predicament that you have just referred to with the notion that I pay +R3700 pm from my monthly package towards medical aid and would expected that all Bills be paid within the Hospitalisation Limit but have just been confronted by the "Undertaking" that should be signed that the Medical Aid is still to be repaid. I came across this 'Blog' as i was trying to do more 'fact finding' on this and it is an eye opener. I would love to join GEMS and am going to make sure that it does happen, just for my sanity although not looking foward to any accidental claims in the future as they seem to be tedious.
Cornelie said:
on Friday 19-Jul-13 12:03 PM
Don't we all just want to work for a government institute you get housing, your medical aid gets refunded, you get a 13th cheque regardless if you have worked through the year you will still get it.
Angelique said:
on Thursday 18-Jul-13 02:54 PM
Anyone else find it strange that government medical aid would allow its members to keep that money? and not put it back into the state? Is it too much admin work? or would it be another tunnel that could lead to corruption? Either way, I'm sure the members aren't complaining but if the public knew they would be complaining.
Benita said:
on Thursday 18-Jul-13 09:35 AM
It really is interesting to see how greedy people get
Catherine said:
on Thursday 18-Jul-13 08:31 AM
The reason most client's get upset is because they do not read the small print in their policies.
Alexis said:
on Thursday 18-Jul-13 07:54 AM
The benefits of working for the government. Medical Aids are not cheap at all as it is and it is better the way it is done now considering
Joyce said:
on Wednesday 17-Jul-13 05:00 PM
Gems medical aid scheme sounds different from other medical aid schemes
Tanya - The T said:
on Wednesday 17-Jul-13 12:23 PM
Well this is a depressing blog...
Cherise said:
on Wednesday 17-Jul-13 12:23 PM
Really interesting factor , however, medical aid cant be based on the idea of a accident and past meds to be recovered it should be chosen according to benefits, and should a accident occur its only right that the medicals aid get refunded.
Lucretia said:
on Wednesday 17-Jul-13 12:21 PM
I don't mind the money going back to the medical aids. I would rather have lower premiums. Lets look at this part of the medical aid as "excess". If the excess is high, the premiums are low. I don't mind low premiums because, please God, I am one of the lucky ones that NEVER have a serious accident. Suits me.
Sheena said:
on Wednesday 17-Jul-13 12:20 PM
Agreed with Yolandi. Its only fair that you get back what you spent why not recover the cost if you can? Doesn't make any sense. The money doesn't belong to the client...
Yolandi P said:
on Wednesday 17-Jul-13 12:01 PM
I think its only fair that what you spent you get back. If the medical aid spent money on your behalf they have the right to the money. It comes down to plain greediness in my opinion.
Sorea said:
on Wednesday 17-Jul-13 11:24 AM
Huh, isn't it a little financially unwise to not recover what could possibly be quite an expenditure and rather giving that money to the person who already had the benefit thereof? In essence they are paying for the injury and then double paying the client for their injuries by not recovering the costs. Makes no sense.
Michael said:
on Wednesday 17-Jul-13 11:04 AM
Of course you can only be a member of GEMS if you or your parents work for the Government. You can't just join as a member of the public. You can pay for it all as a member of the public via your taxes though :)
marilie said:
on Wednesday 17-Jul-13 08:40 AM
GEMS IS A VERY GOOD MEDICAL AID the fact that they all0w employees to keep the money that has been recovered from the RAF .I am with this medical aid (gems) and personally its the best medical aid ,I will advise everybody to get
Johannesburg based attorney specializing in personal injury matters including Road Accident Fund claims and medical negligence matters. My interests include golf, reading and the internet and the way it is constantly developing. I have a passion for life and a desire for less stress!