Attorney Michael de Broglio on: South Africa, Law, Politics, Attorneys, Sport, Photography, Technology, Gadgets, Media, Crime, Road Accidents Fund,
Divorce, Maintenance, Personal Injury, Medical Negligence
The 2024 U.S. presidential election is just around the corner, and it's been interesting to observe how the different candidates are adapting their campaign strategies. One notable shift is their increased focus on non-traditional media platforms, particularly podcasts, compared to the previous election cycle.
While television advertising remains a staple of modern campaigning, candidates are now placing greater emphasis on reaching voters through alternative channels. Former President Donald Trump, for instance, made a high-profile appearance on Joe Rogan's influential podcast, which has a massive following. Similarly, Democratic candidate Kamala Harris and her running mate have participated in numerous podcast interviews, though they have not yet ventured onto the Joe Rogan Show, a decision that some commentators believe may be a missed opportunity given Rogan's extensive reach.
This trend reflects the evolving media landscape and shifting consumption habits of the electorate. Fewer people are relying on traditional news sources like The New York Times and The Washington Post, opting instead for podcasts, satellite radio, and other media outlets that align more closely with their political leanings. This development has both positive and negative implications.
On the positive side, it allows candidates to engage directly with their core supporters and tailor their messaging to specific audiences. However, the downside is that voters may be exposed to a more homogeneous range of perspectives, potentially limiting their exposure to diverse viewpoints and unbiased information. In an ideal scenario, people would strive for a balanced diet of media consumption, channel-hopping across various sources to gain a well-rounded understanding of the issues. However, the younger generation's penchant for cutting cable subscriptions in favor of on-demand and streaming options suggests that traditional television may be losing its grip as the dominant medium for political discourse.
As the election approaches, it will be fascinating to see how the candidates continue to navigate this shifting media landscape and whether their strategic use of podcasts and other non-traditional platforms ultimately translates into electoral success.
Posted by Michael de Broglio on Wednesday 30-Oct-24
Post a Comment
Comments
Roxanne said:
on Thursday 31-Oct-24 11:47 AM
Absolutely, the shift toward non-traditional media like podcasts is a significant trend in the 2024 election cycle. Candidates are recognizing that many voters, especially younger demographics, are turning to podcasts for news and analysis. This medium allows for deeper engagement and a more personal connection with audiences.
Campaigns are leveraging podcasts not just for advertisements, but also by participating in interviews that allow candidates to discuss their policies and personalities in a more conversational setting. This approach can humanize candidates and provide voters with insights that traditional media might not cover in depth.
Additionally, podcasts can serve as a platform for grassroots movements, helping to amplify voices and issues that might be overlooked by mainstream media. As candidates tailor their messages to resonate with specific audiences, we might see even more innovative uses of this medium as the election unfolds.
Micaila said:
on Thursday 31-Oct-24 10:08 AM
Both candidates were tied on Monday. Despite the attacks on his life, Donald Trump appears to bounce back stronger, and I believe that more people will support him.
Since the candidates are targeting a generation that is highly opinionated and knows what they want from a political leader, the constantly evolving technology has actually made it easier for them. However, as they have less to lose, both candidates may be deceived by the elder generation.
It may appear that podcasts are the way to go now.
With less than a week left, I'm interested to see how this plays out.
Michelle Heath said:
on Thursday 31-Oct-24 09:09 AM
By engaging directly with audiences on platforms like Joe Rogan’s show, candidates can tailor their messages effectively. However, this trend also raises concerns about echo chambers, where voters may only hear familiar perspectives, limiting their exposure to diverse viewpoints.
Clare said:
on Thursday 31-Oct-24 09:06 AM
With candidates hopping on podcasts like they’re running for the last slice of pizza at a party, it’s clear that engaging with voters is now about more than just traditional media. Let’s just hope they’re serving up more than just echo chambers—because a well-rounded political diet is key!
Mary said:
on Thursday 31-Oct-24 08:57 AM
As for me, the younger generation's preference for on-demand and streaming services over traditional television may be causing them to lose interest in the medium of political discourse and this is shying away from the essence of voting for a political leader and someone who strives for the interests of their country.
Jennefer Hart said:
on Thursday 31-Oct-24 08:35 AM
It is a smart solution to reaching a larger audience. Social media is the largest and fastest growing means of communication and information sharing since the beginning of technological advancements. All information shared on social media platforms allow the people to make informed and practical decisions. It's crazy how social media has impacted and changed the world since the early 1970s.
Jessica van den Berg said:
on Thursday 31-Oct-24 08:27 AM
I must say I like how Trump is so direct and not apologetic for what he says whether people like it or not. Sad that there have been two attempts on his life already though. Some people take politics a bit too far.
Tiffany Bonn said:
on Thursday 31-Oct-24 08:13 AM
It's an amazing development. It allows for a more personal connection and in-depth discussions .It is also a great tool for younger audiences who might not engage with traditional media
Tersia said:
on Thursday 31-Oct-24 07:25 AM
The shift the U.S. presidential election has made towards non-traditional media platforms like podcasts during this election is quite a fascinating development. Candidates are clearly recognizing that reaching audiences where they are—on platforms that resonate with their daily lives—is crucial for connecting with voters, especially the younger demographics who are moving away from traditional news outlets.
david said:
on Thursday 31-Oct-24 05:49 AM
i am amazed by how many incredibly stupid people there are in america. it must be an incredibly frustrating place to live.
Tamia said:
on Wednesday 30-Oct-24 04:37 PM
The vlog insightfully captures the shift toward podcasts in political campaigning, showcasing how candidates are adapting to changing media consumption. While this allows for direct engagement, it also raises concerns about echo chambers and limited perspectives among voters
Aspen Store said:
on Wednesday 30-Oct-24 04:35 PM
It’s really fascinating to observe how politics and social media are evolving together, especially when comparing South African campaigns to those in the U.S. The strategies and platforms used can vary so much based on cultural context and voter demographics.
Johannesburg based attorney specializing in personal injury matters including Road Accident Fund claims and medical negligence matters. My interests include golf, reading and the internet and the way it is constantly developing. I have a passion for life and a desire for less stress!
